Mathilde Androuët

MEP

Patriots for Europe

France (Rassemblement national)

Filter

1069 amendments sorted by date

  1. Amendment No.85 to Paragraph 29

    29. Notes that a new call for the next Executive Director was launched in September 2024; emphasises that the selection procedure must guarantee complete independence from lobbies and from any...

  2. Amendment No.39 to Paragraph 8

    8. Reiterates the importance of proper scrutiny of climate expenditure in the Union budget, and holds the Commission accountable for the implementation of a robust and reliable methodology, in line...

  3. Amendment No.66 to Paragraph 24 a (new)

    24a. Points out that ECHA and EFSA opinions have a direct impact on the competitiveness of strategic sectors such as agriculture, agri-food, plastics and the French chemical industry; calls...

  4. Amendment No.66 to Paragraph 12 a (new)

    12a. Expresses deep concern at the revelations that the LIFE programme has directly or indirectly funded political lobbying and militant communication activities promoting the Green Deal,...

  5. Amendment No.5 to Paragraph 4

    4. Welcomes the measures taken by the agencies in light of the European Parliament recommendations in its discharge for the financial year 2023; stresses the importance of maintaining the...

  6. Amendment No.10 to Paragraph 2

    2. Stresses that, given the scale and importance of their tasks, the Commission Directorates-General working in the areas of environment, climate action and food safety should concentrate more...

  7. Amendment No.59 to Paragraph 22

    22. Notes the continuous involvement of EFSA in the work of the ENVI Committee and more generally its engagement in initiatives related to food safety, while emphasising the need to...

  8. Amendment No.35 to Paragraph 14

    14. Commends the increased collaboration with other EU agencies; welcomes in particular the continuous cooperation with EFSA, with which a joint guidance on risk assessments on bees from...

  9. Amendment No.19 to Paragraph 3 b (new)

    3b. Regrets that, despite the scale of the amounts committed, the Commission is still unable to provide an independent and robust assessment of the cost- effectiveness of expenditure on the...

  10. Amendment No.61 to Paragraph 11 a (new)

    11a. Stresses that the accumulation of EU environmental regulations already places a heavy burden on agricultural holdings and forestry businesses; takes the view that the mechanical setting...

  11. Amendment No.11 to Paragraph 6

    6. Acknowledges the crucial role of ECHA in implementing an increasing amount of Union legislation; notes that in recent years ECHA has been tasked with additional responsibilities...

  12. Amendment No.74 to Paragraph 12 e (new)

    12e. Calls for a thoroughgoing revision of the LIFE Regulation in order to explicitly prohibit the funding of policy- influencing activities, political activism, ideological communication or...

  13. Amendment No.42 to Paragraph 16

    16. Notes that the EEA is tasked with tracking progress linked to the 8th Environment Action programme (‘8th EAP’), which is largely based on the European Green Deal;...

  14. Amendment No.82 to Paragraph 15 a (new)

    15a. Stresses the need to ensure that environmental expenditure does not internally distort competition, undermine European food sovereignty or unfairly penalise Member States that have...

  15. Amendment No.1 to Paragraph 1 a (new)

    1a. Regrets the fact that too much legislative power lies in the hands of unelected agencies; emphasises that their role must remain a strictly technical one, and that politically sensitive...

  16. Amendment No.14 to Paragraph 8

    8. Welcomes the organisational review that ECHA undertook to address the evolving nature and increasing complexity of its tasks and mandates; calls on ECHA to follow up on the implementation of the...

  17. Amendment No.34 to Paragraph 13 a (new)

    13a. Calls for complete transparency with regard to the agencies’ interactions with militant NGOs or lobbies; calls on the agencies to publish, as a matter of course, the list of their non-...

  18. Amendment No.2 to Paragraph 2 a (new)

    2a. Warns against a broad interpretation of the One Health approach, which could serve as a basis for extending the powers of the agencies beyond their initial remit;

  19. Amendment No.37 to Paragraph 14 a (new)

    14a. Warns against a broad interpretation of the One Health approach, which could serve as a basis for extending the powers of the agencies beyond their initial remit;

  20. Amendment No.18 to Paragraph 3 a (new)

    3a. Notes that the accounting of climate-related expenditure is based on a questionable flat-rate method, allowing the Commission to artificially inflate the share of the budget allocated to...

  21. Amendment No.37 to Paragraph 7 b (new)

    7b. Notes that the climate-related and environmental obligations (compliance, reporting, certification, audits, energy transition) imposed on European companies incur increasing direct and...

  22. Amendment No.36 to Paragraph 7 a (new)

    7a. Is concerned about the SRF's lack of transparency, since its funds have been used by several Member States to finance measures not directly related to the green or climate transition;...

  23. Amendment No.28 to Paragraph 11 a (new)

    11a. Points out that ECHA and EFSA opinions have a direct impact on the competitiveness of strategic sectors such as agriculture, agri-food, plastics and the French chemical industry; calls...

  24. Amendment No.23 to Paragraph 11

    11. Notes that in 2024, 178 outputs were delivered out of the planned 200; recognises the performance of the ECHA committees in delivering opinions to the Commission; welcomes the...

  25. Amendment No.40 to Paragraph 15 a (new)

    15a. Emphasises that a number of the EEA’s publications reflect an ideological approach to the Green Deal that is likely to have a disproportionate impact on Europe’s agricultural and...

  26. Amendment No.4 to Paragraph 1 a (new)

    1a. Deplores the fact that the Commission's highly positive presentation of budget implementation masks a persistent lack of reliable indicators, comprehensive audits and independent ex-post...

  27. Amendment No.72 to Paragraph 12 c (new)

    12c. Calls on the Commission to immediately suspend all LIFE funding for the entities mentioned in various media reports concerning the misuse of the LIFE programme until such time as full...

  28. Amendment No.70 to Paragraph 12 b (new)

    12b. Recalls that several NGOs funded by LIFE are simultaneously involved in drawing up, promoting and assessing EU environmental policies, with the serious risk of engendering conflicts of...

  29. Amendment No.73 to Paragraph 12 d (new)

    12d. Deplores the fact that certain organisations funded by LIFE were invited by the Commission to participate in the drafting of legislative proposals while at the same time conducting...

  30. Amendment No.55 to Paragraph 11

    11. Regrets that projections for 2026 and 2027 predict that the target of 10% of the annual budget allocated to biodiversity will not be achieved; notes that there is an average annual financing...

Discover the reference media for public affairs

More than 12,000 decision-makers read us every morning

Start a trial

10 minutes a day to master the essentials of political information.

+50 expert journalists give you early access to key information.

21 official sources scrutinised according to your topics to deliver the information that should not be missed.

You are currently simulating browsing with the IP address: