Mathilde Androuët

8. Reiterates the importance of proper scrutiny of climate expenditure in the Union budget, and holds the Commission accountable for the implementation of a robust and reliable methodology, in line...

11. Regrets that projections for 2026 and 2027 predict that the target of 10% of the annual budget allocated to biodiversity will not be achieved; notes that there is an average annual financing...

7b. Notes that the climate-related and environmental obligations (compliance, reporting, certification, audits, energy transition) imposed on European companies incur increasing direct and...

29. Notes that a new call for the next Executive Director was launched in September 2024; emphasises that the selection procedure must guarantee complete independence from lobbies and from any...

24a. Points out that ECHA and EFSA opinions have a direct impact on the competitiveness of strategic sectors such as agriculture, agri-food, plastics and the French chemical industry; calls...

4. Welcomes the measures taken by the agencies in light of the European Parliament recommendations in its discharge for the financial year 2023; stresses the importance of maintaining the...

3b. Regrets that, despite the scale of the amounts committed, the Commission is still unable to provide an independent and robust assessment of the cost- effectiveness of expenditure on the...

14a. Warns against a broad interpretation of the One Health approach, which could serve as a basis for extending the powers of the agencies beyond their initial remit;

12b. Recalls that several NGOs funded by LIFE are simultaneously involved in drawing up, promoting and assessing EU environmental policies, with the serious risk of engendering conflicts of...

1a. Deplores the fact that the Commission's highly positive presentation of budget implementation masks a persistent lack of reliable indicators, comprehensive audits and independent ex-post...

7a. Is concerned about the SRF's lack of transparency, since its funds have been used by several Member States to finance measures not directly related to the green or climate transition;...

14. Commends the increased collaboration with other EU agencies; welcomes in particular the continuous cooperation with EFSA, with which a joint guidance on risk assessments on bees from...

22. Notes the continuous involvement of EFSA in the work of the ENVI Committee and more generally its engagement in initiatives related to food safety, while emphasising the need to...

11. Notes that in 2024, 178 outputs were delivered out of the planned 200; recognises the performance of the ECHA committees in delivering opinions to the Commission; welcomes the...

12e. Calls for a thoroughgoing revision of the LIFE Regulation in order to explicitly prohibit the funding of policy- influencing activities, political activism, ideological communication or...

2. Stresses that, given the scale and importance of their tasks, the Commission Directorates-General working in the areas of environment, climate action and food safety should concentrate more...

2a. Warns against a broad interpretation of the One Health approach, which could serve as a basis for extending the powers of the agencies beyond their initial remit;

1a. Regrets the fact that too much legislative power lies in the hands of unelected agencies; emphasises that their role must remain a strictly technical one, and that politically sensitive...

3a. Notes that the accounting of climate-related expenditure is based on a questionable flat-rate method, allowing the Commission to artificially inflate the share of the budget allocated to...

11a. Stresses that the accumulation of EU environmental regulations already places a heavy burden on agricultural holdings and forestry businesses; takes the view that the mechanical setting...

15a. Emphasises that a number of the EEA’s publications reflect an ideological approach to the Green Deal that is likely to have a disproportionate impact on Europe’s agricultural and...

11a. Points out that ECHA and EFSA opinions have a direct impact on the competitiveness of strategic sectors such as agriculture, agri-food, plastics and the French chemical industry; calls...

12d. Deplores the fact that certain organisations funded by LIFE were invited by the Commission to participate in the drafting of legislative proposals while at the same time conducting...

12c. Calls on the Commission to immediately suspend all LIFE funding for the entities mentioned in various media reports concerning the misuse of the LIFE programme until such time as full...

15a. Stresses the need to ensure that environmental expenditure does not internally distort competition, undermine European food sovereignty or unfairly penalise Member States that have...

13a. Calls for complete transparency with regard to the agencies’ interactions with militant NGOs or lobbies; calls on the agencies to publish, as a matter of course, the list of their non-...

16. Notes that the EEA is tasked with tracking progress linked to the 8th Environment Action programme (‘8th EAP’), which is largely based on the European Green Deal;...

6. Acknowledges the crucial role of ECHA in implementing an increasing amount of Union legislation; notes that in recent years ECHA has been tasked with additional responsibilities...

8. Welcomes the organisational review that ECHA undertook to address the evolving nature and increasing complexity of its tasks and mandates; calls on ECHA to follow up on the implementation of the...

12. Notes that the programme for the environment and climate action (LIFE) contributed EUR 769 million in 2024 to support the shift towards a sustainable economy, protect, restore and improve the...