Petras Auštrevičius

4 b. Calls for the appointment of a dedicated European coordinator for each of the priority military mobility corridors to facilitate their implementation;

30 c. Underlines that accurate, secure and up-to-date digital modelling, digital maps, geographic information systems and geospatial data services are indispensable for both civilian and...

30 a. Calls upon the Commission and the Member States to address the shortage of skills relating to military mobility technologies by facilitating and supporting the exchange of knowledge and...

6. Encourages Member States to ensure that the dedicated budgets under the European defence industrial programme, the European Defence Fund, the SAFE, the measures under the Defence Readiness...

10 a. Urges the harmonisation of operational rules in the railway sector by deploying standardised rail solutions, particularly the European Railway Traffic Management System (ERTMS), which...

25. Asks the Commission to urgently establish exemptions from the current public procurement rules for military mobility infrastructure and assets having a significant military or dual-use...

6 a. Encourages to explore possibilities of developing additional financing mechanisms, such as a Defence, Security and Resilience Bank, to address the funding needs of security, defence and...

4. Stresses that a centrally managed and dedicated EU transport funding instrument such as the Connecting Europe Facility must be continued in the next MFF as the main source for robust military...

34 a. Reminds that, while this report primarily focuses on military mobility within EU territory, securing the transatlantic delivery of military equipment and supplies via sea and air is also...

– having regard to the Transport Ministerial Statement on Military Mobility issued by the Transport Ministers of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Hungary, Iceland, Latvia,...

4 c. Highlights that implementation of large transport infrastructure projects crucial to international military mobility may take longer than a single MFF and is not adapted to allocation of...

26 a. Highlights the importance of predictability in terms of the demand for military mobility products, combined with sufficient funding, simplified procurement rules, and support for joint...

4 a. Urges to create, within the upcoming military mobility package, an investment plan for each of the four priority military mobility corridors to streamline military mobility investments...

30 b. Notes the growing use of autonomous vehicles in the delivery of military supplies, which provides a solution to the existing shortage of personnel in military logistics units and...

3. Calls for a comprehensive impact assessment of the EUGHRSR – EU Magnitsky Act and its interaction with the EU country-specific sanctions and the other EU horizontal restrictive...

8 a. Recognizes the importance of broadening the scope of EUGHRSR – EU Magnitsky Act by imposing sanctions on individuals and entities that participate in the circumvention of sanctions,...

13 a. Notes that, so far, a significant proportion of individuals sanctioned under EUGHRSR – EU Magnitsky Act were involved in the state’s repressive apparatus, but did not make decisions;...

B. whereas the EUGHRSR – EU Magnitsky Act, adopted in December 2020, enables the EU to impose restrictive measures on individuals and entities responsible for serious human rights violations...

9. Urges the Member States to refrain from bilateral political or diplomatic actions that undermine or contradict the EU’s unified stance on sanctions; recalls the need that all EU Member...

G. whereas despite progress, substantial gaps remain in the geographical and thematic coverage of listings and in the establishment of benchmarks aligned with the sanctions’ objectives;...

13. Urges the Council to correct current geographical, thematic and gender imbalances in listings under the EUGHRSR - EU Magnitsky Act by extending listings beyond the current...

17. Calls for the Council and the Vice- President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to envision a role for the European Parliament in...

M. whereas some implementation loopholes, such as derogation clauses allowing contracts that were concluded before an individual or entity was listed, create opportunities for sanction...

13 b. Calls for an increased effective communication on imposed sanctions to reiterate the EU’s global stand on human rights and against impunity, as in some cases sanctioned individuals are...

13 c. Condemns any countersanctions imposed on the EU, its institutions and Members, bodies or citizens solely for promoting of and respect for human rights, democracy and the rule of law...

E. whereas numerous Parliament resolutions have called for sanctions instruments to be used in a more flexible way and more often in cases of core international crimes or...

16. Proposes a structured consultation mechanism for civil society engagement in the sanctions process, including the establishment of a transparent, dedicated mechanism for...

J. whereas confidentiality around potential listing or de-listing is key to ensuring the effectiveness of the EUGHRSR – EU Magnitsky Act; whereas Parliament has no role or say in this process;...

1. Reiterates its support for the EUGHRSR – EU Magnitsky Act as a significant foreign policy tool to enhance human rights worldwide; recognises it as an indispensable tool to...

8. Fully supports the imposition of targeted anti-corruption sanctions within the EU framework, which has been a long- standing priority of Parliament, whether through its inclusion in...